3/16/2024 0 Comments Nytimes 2020 election![]() ![]() Justices instead focused at length on two key legal issues raised by Trump in his defense: the question of whether Section 3 can be enforced by a state in the absence of legislation from Congress, as well as a theory holding that the clause’s reference to “officer(s) of the United States” doesn’t include the president. Very little of Thursday’s two-hour hearing, however, was devoted to the specifics of what transpired on Jan. “For the first time in history, the attack was incited by a sitting president of the United States to disrupt the peaceful transfer of presidential power.” “We are here because, for the first time since the War of 1812, our nation’s Capitol came under violent assault,” Jason Murray, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, told the court during Thursday’s oral arguments. 19 that Trump was ineligible, though it stayed its decision pending a highly anticipated U.S. How a Colorado lawsuit against Trump’s eligibility went from ‘long shot’ to the Supreme CourtĪ 4-3 majority of the Colorado Supreme Court, writing that it was “cognizant that we travel in uncharted territory,” ruled on Dec. Colorado was singled out by CREW as a “good venue” for a challenge against Trump’s candidacy because of provisions in its election code that explicitly bar candidates who are ineligible to assume office from appearing on the ballot. Though the clause has been invoked in only a small number of cases in the last 150 years, a challenge brought by CREW successfully led to the 2022 removal of a county commissioner in New Mexico who had participated in the events of Jan. ![]() Section 3 of the amendment prohibits someone who took an oath to support the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection” from holding office again. Capitol disqualify him from office under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. Backed by the liberal nonprofit Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and armed with a legal theory endorsed by a handful of prominent legal scholars, the plaintiffs argued that Trump’s actions in relation to the Jan. The case began last year as a lawsuit filed by six Republican and unaffiliated voters against Trump and Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold. Read more from our reporting on the Trump 14th Amendment case here. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |